&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Archive for February, 2009

Feb 27 2009

Bobby Jindal you’re a fool

lol-cat-jindal.png

No seriously, you’re an idiot Bobby Jindal, and it has nothing to do with that stupid candycane striped tie you were wearing on Tuesday either.

Did you guys catch Jindal’s heartwarming little (or should I say tall… wait don’t let me get too far ahead of myself) tale about himself and the local sherriff taking a stand against red tape government workers who wouldn’t let rescue teams save victims during the Katrina storm? If you didn’t catch it the video is below and here’s the transcript.

“During Katrina, I visited Sheriff Harry Lee, a Democrat and a good friend of mine. When I walked into his makeshift office I’d never seen him so angry. He was yelling into the phone: ‘Well, I’m the Sheriff and if you don’t like it you can come and arrest me!’ I asked him: ‘Sheriff, what’s got you so mad?’ He told me that he had put out a call for volunteers to come with their boats to rescue people who were trapped on their rooftops by the floodwaters. The boats were all lined up ready to go - when some bureaucrat showed up and told them they couldn’t go out on the water unless they had proof of insurance and registration. I told him, ‘Sheriff, that’s ridiculous.’ And before I knew it, he was yelling into the phone: ‘Congressman Jindal is here, and he says you can come and arrest him too!’ Harry just told the boaters to ignore the bureaucrats and start rescuing people.” - Bobby Jindal during the “Republican Response.”

What a cute story right? Bobby Jindal, a republican, working with a democrat, saving people’s lives, standing up to the government… The symbolism here is packed, almost like it’s too good to be true…

Oh wait, it isn’t true. Jindal, you are an idiot. I’d say you disgraced your party but in all fairness you’re not doing anything differently than a majority of your fellow G.O.P. politicians. And to be perfectly clear that is not a compliment.

Three times now today the governor’s office has made a statement about the incident on Ben Smith’s blog, all three times switching up the details.

First, “Team Jindal” recorded this response to Ben Smith’s questioning of the incident.

“It was in the days following the storm. Sheriff Lee was a hero who worked tirelessly to rescue those in danger, and he didn’t take kindly to bureaucrats getting in his way,” said Tim Teepell, the LA governor’s chief of staff.

Well this statement didn’t leave a lot of detail on the event, and given today’s world of public relations and perception, “Team Jindal” would have been wise to leave it at that. Lucky for our entertainment, they didn’t.

Next “Team Jindal” asserted that he “didn’t imply” on Tuesday that the story “took place during the heat of a fight to release rescue boats.” Then Jindal spokeswoman Melissa Sellers told Smith that Jindal interviewed him about the incident “It was days later .. Sheriff Lee was on the phone and the governor came down to visit him. It wasn’t that they were standing right down there with the boats.”

Bear with me, because there’s more BS to sift through yet. That story, somehow mysteriously disappears off of Smith’s blog. Of course syndication can be a pain in the ass sometimes can’t it Bobby? The story was preserved here.

But wait it’s not over yet! “Team Jindal” then sends in yet another update to Ben Smith, which he publishes, that asserts that the story told on Tuesday was the exact same as the one that the Louisiana governor finally settled on late tonight.

Oh and about all those pesky little facts and details that get in the way?

“This is liberal blogger B.S. The story is clear,” said Teepell.

I’ve got nothing else to say. Bobby Jindal? You’re an idiot.

Advertise Here with Today.com

15 responses so far

Feb 26 2009

I think what we’re all looking for here is some logic

postit.jpg

Clowns to the left of me, and jokers to the right.

As desperate Americans look to our main political parties for leadership in this time of struggle all too often we are turned away.

Now for the record this isn’t a slam-Obama post - so I don’t wanna hear it in the comments. What we’re getting out of Obama right now is pretty much what I expected, with a couple of extra tax cuts thrown in for good measure. Any president would be hard-pressed to come up with solutions right now, and remember, there is only so much the president can do. The government entity that really holds the power to enact change is Congress, since they author the bills.

Our nation is at somewhat of a crossroads.

We’ve been humbled greatly by the last eight years. In a somewhat ironic twist this may be one of the more positive aspects of George W. Bush’s legacy. Ironic because it took things getting this bad for people to wake up.

But we did wake up, and that’s part of the statement that was made in November of 2008. Barack Obama (among many other reasons mind you, I just consider this to be the biggest) won the election because he ran on a platform of change. It’s not just a word like some of the so called conservatives out there would want you to believe. It’s an entire movement.

I also push for the case that America did not turn blue this last election as some liberals would want you to believe. I think America got fed up. Obama may not have been the perfect candidate for their cause, but he was a heck of a lot closer than McCain was.

So what happens next?

Make no mistake about it the following months are going to be a ruthless battle between our two political parties. The Republican’s will do all they can to obstruct Obama and his plans. Obama’s repeated calls for unity will be ignored by his opponents on the right as well as his constituents on the left. How much change will Obama be able to bring working with a congress as stubborn as ours? How much extra spending - porkulus - whatever you want to call it - will be required to sway blue-dog democrats and moderate conservatives into following his plans?

The change we’re experiencing is going to be great for our country in a lot of ways. Our government has operated anything but efficiently as of late, and despite the repeated cries of many conservatives, we are moving towards a more efficient America. We just have to play a little catch-up after a few years of blatant neglect.

I understand we need to spend.

Our country is behind. Eight years of Bush policies have led to a massive influx of foreign influence in our economy, a home-owner crisis, and a eventually a full blown economic crisis. Not to mention the jobs that we’ve bled in those eight years. 

We need to come together as a country and this spending at least will be on America. A lot of what Obama is doing isn’t going to show up right away, but we’re going to be much better off after it.

That being said, I hope this spending is for the crisis and doesn’t become a precedent for every president. That is a scary thought to me, and to a lot of Americans, liberal conservative or otherwise.

Protecting the status-quo.

Many of our politicians want you to believe that part of this catch-up includes bailing out (with taxpayer money) companies that have screwed the American people over for years now. This is setting a very dangerous precedent as we move forward, and in all too many ways it is not moving forward.

Free money being given to corporations and companies that proved they could not manage the money that they had. I think the Cato Institute’s Daniel J. Mitchell put it best, saying that the bailouts are like “giving an alcoholic the key to a liquor cabinet.”

Now almost unanimously Americans have not supported these bailouts. Barack Obama did (So did McCain), and it’s one of the main reasons I could not bring myself to punch in my ballot bubble next to his name in November.

Other politicians want you to think that the problems facing our economy can be solved by across the board tax cuts. I would love it if this were true, but look at how much our government is spending already.

Government spending - An issue that is out of hand.

Politicians spend millions of dollars to urge people not to smoke while spending more millions to subsidize tobacco farmers. They send billions overseas for foreign aid all the while balooning the federal deficit. They spend millions to subsidize public art while working families struggle to find enough income. Politicians also run trains, bail out savings and loans, construct houses, sell insurance, print books, and build expensive sports complexes.

We need to seriously ask ourselves how many things should our government be in charge of? Better yet, that question is rhetorical (that means don’t answer it).

We can’t keep spending at the levels we currently are.

This is supposedly a priority of the Obama administration. Maybe he just thinks it should be a priority for America in the future and not now because I don’t see it. Two trillion dollars saved by 2016 when our government (on its current path) is slated to spend way more than that by then is not enough. Not nearly.

Our national debt will shortly cross the 11 trillion dollar mark (can you even fathom that amount of money?). Thank god China is still buying up our government’s ‘toxic assets’ because if they stop our currency will lose its value overnight. Period.

I spoke earlier about how one of the lasting effects of the Bush administration may be a more humble America. An America that wants to keep its spending within its limits. An America that doesn’t want to keep passing the burden of debt down onto its children and grandchildren.

As we move forward we need to ask ourselves what role we want the government to play in the future. What is important and needs to be protected, and what should be cut because it is wasteful spending.

But listen up here, because this is the important part. This debate is one that will continue as long as we have our government in place. Balancing our budget is not a new issue by any means. Even more importantly though, it is a precursor to an even bigger issue facing our country.

There is a very real solution that is possible here - one that only a few of our elected representatives are talking about.

Solution - Ending debt as we know it.

According to Federal Reserve’s website, the Fed is in charge of

1.) Conducting the nation’s monetary policy by influencing money and credit conditions in the economy in pursuit of full employment and stable prices.

I think it’s pretty safe to say they get a fail here.

2.) Supervising and regulating banking institutions to ensure the safety and soundness of the nation’s banking and financial system and to protect the credit rights of consumers.

Ha! That’s a big fail here too, isn’t it?

3.) Maintaining the stability of the financial system and containing systemic risk that may arise in financial markets.

Maintaining stability in the financial system, they’re doing a great job there aren’t they?

4.) Providing certain financial services to the U.S. government, to the public, to financial institutions, and to foreign official institutions, including playing a major role in operating the nation’s payments systems.

I’ll go ahead and give them an F+ on number four, since they’ve definitely been providing financial services to the government. Besides, I’m feeling rather chipper today.

All jokes aside the Federal Reserve’s mismanagement of our money has had a devastating effect on our currency. As of 2009 the U.S. dollar had lost 96% of its value in the 96 years that the Federal Reserve has been unconstitutionally in place. Why do we turn to these guys?

When it comes down to it the Federal Reserve is a huge sham. A ponzi scheme, to use a recent term - designed to create money that you don’t see out of thin air, and then they even have the cajones to charge you for it on top of that.

The whole elaborate system - debt, interest and inflation - are all tools to make money off of you before you even spend your dollar. Without this system in place your dollar would immediately be worth 35% more due to the interest that is charged to your dollar before it is even printed.

Through acts like the Monetary Control Act of 1980 the Federal Reserve has expanded its control and now can create even more interest at the expense of the unprinted dollar. In fact, interest creates so much artificial money now off of the dollar before it is printed that we had to create a term for it - inflation.

Inflation, debt and interest don’t have to be there. At all. They were created as schemes to get bankers rich, and even worse we’ve let it happen and we let our politicians use them as excuses for their failures. Well I’m sick of it, for one.

Isn’t it time we had some real change?

The Federal Reserve is no more Federal than the Federal Express. They have virtually no congressional oversight, and really no oversight from anyone at all. Their interests and objectives have been brought out into the open with this latest economic recession. America it is once again time to wake up.

As I pointed out earlier, the real power for change rests in Congress. Here’s where you guys come in. At any point, I repeat, at ANY POINT Congress can make changes to the Federal Reserve Act. Contact your representatives and senators and let them know how you feel about this. Tell them you’re interested in real solutions towards ending our debt, starting with ending the debt-based monetary structure that we have right now.

Go to recovery.org and tell President Barack Obama that the American people want real recovery and real change and that they want it now.

Sign this petition, this one, or this one. Make your own petition if you have to.

For the love of our country do something America. This has to stop now.

12 responses so far

Feb 26 2009

A break from politics

Published by skwguitar under News Today Edit This

Only for a post I swear, and it’s with good reason. Any of you guys basketball fans? Well my boy Lebron James (some of you may know him as King James) of the Cleveland Cavaliers is doing things this season that are on a completely different level. Look for no further proof than the following video.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaand boom goes the dynamite! How would you like to play HORSE against that guy?

No responses yet

Feb 25 2009

Clean Coal commercial

Published by skwguitar under Social Issues Edit This

Anybody see this commercial? It’d be hilarious if it wasn’t so true. Check it out and then head over to thisisreality.org to learn the true facts about the enigma that is “Clean Coal.”

Now the last few days they took commenting off of today.com except for today.com registered users. This was a temporary thing and apparently commenting is back to normal. I’d like to give a thanks to the Today.com support team for listening to us bloggers out there. You guys are doing a great job, keep up the good work.

Three cheers, everybody can comment again.

6 responses so far

Feb 25 2009

Bobby Jindal addresses America, sounds like he’s talking to preschoolers

So how about that “Republican Response” from rising G.O.P. superstar Bobby Jindal? Anyone else catch that? What were you thinking Jindal? You sounded like you were talking to a bunch of five year old kids. Your little speech lacked detail to the point that it was obvious you had prepared it long before hearing what Obama had to say. Instead of getting with the program and offering real solutions to the real problems we face, you kept with that same party line.

“The way to lead is not to raise taxes and put more money and power in hands of Washington politicians,” said Jindal.

He went on to talk about Katrina. He gave a story about boaters after the hurricane who were apparently stopped by a F.E.M.A. official or something. Hey Jindal, I know F.E.M.A. was a mess, we all know F.E.M.A. was a mess. Bush didn’t help you guys nearly in time, and the consequences of that was terrible.

What happened in Katrina should never happen again, but if we are to follow Jindal’s logic (And the republican’s logic, if you can stomach calling it that) since the government messed up in Katrina we shouldn’t try to fix the government we should just all accept the fact that government is broken. For now and forever. Not learn from the mistakes, not make sure a repeat of the crisis doesn’t happen again, not try to stop things like that from happening in the first place. Just never rely on our government for anything. Anybody else hearing what is wrong with this?

“You elected Republicans to champion limited government, fiscal discipline, and personal responsibility,” he said. “Instead, Republicans went along with earmarks and big government spending in Washington,” Jindal continued, “Our party is determined to regain your trust.”

So yeah you guys, we messed up. When we told you we were going to do one thing we did the exact opposite. Well shucks, we’re sorry. You should trust us though because… Because why? You’ve found a change of heart? History isn’t going to repeat itself?

This sounds just like Michael Steele the other day when he said that there was no reason to trust the republicans. We’re really supposed to believe you guys changed? The republican party isn’t changing at all. You’re not fooling anyone.

Seriously! You guys don’t know what you’re doing! Your party is a mess. Your clamoring out for leadership and grasping in all of the wrong spots. Bobby Jindal? This guy doesn’t even support abortions in rape, abuse or incest cases.

Sarah Palin? Do I even need to get started on her? This woman wanted creationism taught in public schools and honestly believed that abstinence only teachings actually work. Speaking of “abstinence” anybody hear that interview Bristol Palin had with FOX?

Yeah I like how the Alaskan governor was all like “Oh no leave my kids out of this no one talk to my kids leave them out of this” but somehow Greta Van Susteren (who needs to shut her mouth before she talks too) managed to sneak in for an interview with Bristol. But the best part was when Bristol admitted her mother’s abstinence only ideas were unrealistic. I wonder how that played out with the religious right…

How about Kentucky Senate Republican Mitch McConnell?

“We will have our differences” in working together, McConnell said. “Republicans believe the road back to prosperity is paved with greater personal freedom, not bigger government.”

Greater personal freedom? You two-faced… It makes me so mad I can barely type. What was the Patriot Act? What was the Real ID deal all about? You guys took a red pen to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights! Small government? What about no-bid contracts in Iraq, leaving the Iraq and Afghanistan wars off of the budget and still increasing government spending in other areas. The hypocrisy is killing me…

Republicans? You need to take a long look in the mirror and think… That was your government that was broken. George W. Bush and his rubber-stamp approval from your joke of a legislature let situations get way out of hand and then you reacted terribly in times of crisis.

And that entire fricking time you didn’t care about fiscally conservative policies. Most republicant leaders haven’t cared about fiscal responsibility in decades. You’ve got to be kidding me. Have you not looked at the data - every single time you guys control the presidency our budget deficit increases dramatically. You’re not the party of fiscal responsibility you’re the party of picking one or two opposition issues and holding your ground - this time it just so happens to be fiscal responsibility.

Americans know though. It’s just the flavor of the week for a desperate and fading political party.

I don’t agree with everything that the democrats are doing either. Heck most democrats don’t agree with everything the dems are doing either. But at least they’re making an attempt to help people. That’s why they’re so much more popular than you guys are right now!

People need help, they need help from the government because it was the government that messed up and got us in this spot in the first place. We need to learn from our mistakes, learn from history and make things better for the future.

It’s called progress, G.O.P. and it’s the new trend in America. Polls show that people want you to come on board. History shows that you probably won’t.

6 responses so far

Feb 24 2009

McCain still a bitter old man - Obama still good in the clutch

This moment kind of reminds me of McCain on the campaign trail or in the debates with President Obama. The more things change the more they stay the same I suppose. Even when McCain was bringing up a good point - and the amount of money we spend on defense is a good point - he always seemed to manage to ruin his point by sounding bitter and, well, old.

How they ever thought that man had a chance against Obama is beyond me, and I thought that before he picked up Palin…

Anyways, it’s a funny video, check it out. Make sure you guys watch Obama’s speech tonight too. If you’re really feeling sassy, tune into the G.O.P.’s “answer to Obama” Bobby Jindal with the Republican response. I’ll have a reactionary post shortly after.

A recent poll in the Washington Post showed terrible approval ratings for the Republicans while Obama’s approval rating has actually gained ground.

The New York Times ran a poll that showed that 79% of the people thought that Republicans needed to make “working with Democrats more of a priority” as opposed to 17% who thought the Republicans needed to “keep pushing Republican policies.” In this same poll 63% of people approved of the way Barack Obama was handling his presidency as opposed to 22% who disapproved.

It will be interesting to see how these so called conservatives in Congress respond to the budget proposals that Obama makes in his speech tonight.

One response so far

Feb 23 2009

Syrian President meets with Senator John Kerry - Kerry still looks like horse

Published by skwguitar under World Politics Edit This

Sorry guys, I can’t leave you with much today. I did find this little tidbit though - U.S. Senator John Kerry met with Syrian president Bashar al-Assad in Damascus on Saturday to explore the prospects for improving relations between the two countries.

Interesting video, check it out. I’ve got something good for you guys tomorrow.

5 responses so far

Feb 22 2009

Israeli election holds many questions

Published by skwguitar under World Politics Edit This

Israel’s newly elected (well technically Tzipi Livni got more votes but… I guess sometimes in elections that just doesn’t matter) hardline Prime Minister-designate Benjamin Netanyahu met with the moderate Livni in a bid to form an alliance with his recent campaign rival.

Though the meeting between the two reportedly went well, no agreement was reached this time.

“We didn’t reach any agreement. There are deep disagreements on this issue,” said Livni. “This evening did not progress us on the core issues in a way that we can talk about a joint path.”

The point of disagreement that Livni is talking about is the issue of negotiating with the Palestinians, something Netanyahu has been reluctant to support in the past.

Netanyahu has six weeks to form a coalition and if he is unable to do so with Livni’s moderate Kadima party then he will likely have to forge a relationship with the even more conservative Ultra-Nationalists. At that point you can throw negotiations out of the window completely.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out as it will definitely have an effect on how the Obama administration handles the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“I intend and expect to cooperate with the Obama administration and to try to advance the common goals of peace, security and prosperity for us and our neighbors,” Netanyahu told reporters before the meeting with Livni. “I hope to do so in a unity government.”

One response so far

Feb 21 2009

Today, I got a little more confidence in our new president

Why is that? Well as my regular readers may know, I’m a left-leaning libertarian (I know right?). One of the biggest reasons I can’t just call myself a progressive is that at heart I consider myself a true fiscal conservative (They’re harder to find than you’d think. The term ‘fiscal conservative’ seems to get thrown around a lot, but often times the person talking about it doesn’t know the first thing about it).

One of the issues I feel most passionately about is debt. The subject has been well documented in this blog (notice my national debt widget), and I probably will continue to document it until we truly free our country from the chains that debt brings.

Needless to say, as a fiscal conservative, the gargantuous stimulus package paired with Timothy Geithner’s plan to prop up the financial sector seemed to be a continuation of Bush’s big government policies. Yes, Republican two-term president George W. Bush, who campaigned as a ‘fiscal conservative’, played a huge role in increasing the size of our government. This increase in spending has led to a ballooning of our National Debt.

national-debt-gdp-l.gif

Now during the campaign Barack Obama had made a lot of statements about our debt. Since his presidency began though, the rhetoric changed dramatically. That’s why today I was pleased to hear news that Obama plans to address the issue head on.

“We can’t generate sustained growth without getting our deficits under control,” Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address, declaring that his budget will be “sober in its assessments, honest in its accounting, and lays out in detail my strategy for investing in what we need, cutting what we don’t, and restoring fiscal discipline.”

The White House will be holding a summit on fiscal policy on Monday where Obama will likely release more details of the plan. Tuesday evening the President will make his first speech to Congress and will likely give a rough outline of the plan to our senators and representatives on Thursday.

A White House official, speaking on a condition of anonymity since the budget has not been released yet, said that Obama plans to focus on three central campaign promises to achieve the debt-reduction.

1. Ending the war in Iraq.
2. Letting the Bush Tax cuts for people making over 250,000 a year expire.
3. Improving government efficiency by cutting back wasteful spending.

The official said that President Obama’s proposal for the 2010 fiscal year estimates that the $1.3 trillion deficit he has inherited from former President George W. Bush will be halved to $533 billion by 2013.

Can Obama turn around an ailing economy about to enter its second year of recession and simultaneously cut in half our government’s budget deficit? I’m not sure, it seems like a pretty lofty goal, especially in only four years. I’m glad to hear this is one issue that is still on the President’s mind though. I was starting to think maybe he’d forgotten…

10 responses so far

Feb 20 2009

Does this look racist to you?

Published by skwguitar under Social Issues Edit This

400http-_dyimgcom_a_p_ap_20090218_captea1cf7fd72734031a84bdce41da4f654ny_post_cartoon_nyr101.jpg

13 responses so far

Next »

Advertise Here